The Digital-Inclusive Nexus: How Technology-Mediated HRM Practices Foster Employee-Driven Social Responsibility in Smes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijebma.v8i2.3525Keywords:
Inclusive HRM, Digital Transformation, Employee Social Responsibility, Smes, Grounded TheoryAbstract
This paper grew out of a puzzle I encountered during fieldwork in three Chinese SMEs. Some employees in these firms volunteered for community projects and environmental initiatives. Others did not. What explained the difference? I set out to answer this question by looking at how inclusive HRM practices shape employees' voluntary social-responsibility behaviors. I also wanted to know whether digital technologies—which these firms had adopted at different levels—amplified or dampened those effects. I used stakeholder theory, self-determination theory, and digital embeddedness theory as my conceptual lenses. To test my ideas, I conducted a multi-case grounded-theory study of three SMEs in the Yangtze River Delta. I carried out 18 semi-structured interviews, reviewed internal company documents, and examined publicly available CSR materials. My analysis revealed a consistent pattern. Employees who experience inclusive HRM—characterized by equity, development, support, and participation—develop stronger psychological ownership of their organization. This leads them to perceive their employer as genuinely committed to social values. That perception, in turn, motivates them to act in socially responsible ways on their own initiative. Digital tools play a moderating role: when they make HR processes transparent and accessible, they strengthen the entire chain. When they are used for surveillance, the chain weakens. These findings contribute to CSR scholarship by showing the micro-level processes through which HRM affects employee behavior, and they offer practical guidance for SMEs with limited resources.
References
Barney, J., & Hesterly, W. (2021). Strategic management and competitive advantage (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the strength of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203-221.
Choi, S. N., & Yu, J. (2021). Inclusive human resource management and employee innovative behavior: The role of psychological empowerment and diversity climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 174(3), 529-544.
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in emerging organizational fields. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 175-222.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 802-835.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter.
Grant, A. M. (2012). Leading with meaning: Beneficiary contact, prosocial impact, and the performance of fundraisers. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 458-476.
Harvey, C., & Allard, M. (2015). Inclusive workplaces: A review and model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35, 1-30.
Hess, M. (2004). Spatial relationships: Towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness. Progress in Human Geography, 28(2), 165-186.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Kovalainen, A., & Alvesson, M. (2020). Digitalization and inclusiveness of HRM practices: The example of neurodiversity initiatives. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(4), 567-584.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
Riordan, C. M., Flippen, M., & Robbins, S. B. (2005). The relational demography of work groups: Dissimilarity and team performance. Group & Organization Management, 30(2), 170-191.
Shin, D., Lee, C., Shin, C., & Kim, K. Y. (2025). e-HRM and innovation: A digital fit perspective on resource deployment, utilization, and integration. Academy of Management Proceedings, 99bp.
Stahl, G. K., Brewster, C., Hajro, A., & Galcic, D. (2020). Inclusive leadership and employee outcomes: The role of psychological safety. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(2), 145-166.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Van de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802-821.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An interpretive sociology. University of California Press.
Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42(5), 726-743.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dahao Li

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



